linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.27-rc4-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.26

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080827.154343.18918939.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, petero2@...ia.com, rjw@...k.pl,
	alan@...hat.com, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bunk@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, protasnb@...il.com,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc4-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.26

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:38:16 -0700 (PDT)

> Btw, why is unlocked_ioctl returning "long"? Does anybody depend on that 
> too? That's another difference between the "unlocked" and the traditional 
> version..

The return values want to be "long" sign extended all the way back
down to syscall dispatch, I think this is just an effort to add
some consistency here so that the int --> long extension eventually
can be eliminated once unlocked_ioctl is the only case left.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/