[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080828092120.b9b198bb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:21:20 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/59] CRED: Wrap task credential accesses in the IA64
arch
Hi David, Artem,
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:24:38 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...dex.ru> wrote:
>
> > Fine with me.
>
> Can I count that as an Acked-by?
>
> > Do you want us to put this patch to ubifs-2.6.git or you
> > prefer to make it go together with the rest of the CRED patches?
>
> Ummm... I'll check. I'm not sure exactly how Stephen wanted to play this.
I am happy for these patches to go into both the subsystem and creds
trees (the mess - if any - will be on my head). I do expect this to
reduce conflicts in the longer term.
It is much better for that to happen than for a subsystem maintainer to
apply a slightly different fixup when I find a conflict. If there is not
conflict between the subsystem tree and the creds tree, then it doesn't
matter if the patch is in both trees or not.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists