[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1219815617.18027.132.camel@sauron>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:40:17 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To: Bruce Leonard <brucle@...thlink.net>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add support for > 2GiB MTD devices
Hi Bruce,
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 14:27 -0700, Bruce Leonard wrote:
> +/*
> + * Inline function for determining the size of the MTD device, independant
> + * of old or new way of doing things.
> + *
> + */
> +static inline u_int64_t device_size(struct mtd_info *a)
> +{
> + return a->num_eraseblocks == 0 ? a->size : a->num_eraseblocks * a->erasesize;
> +}
I do not think it is a good idea to do multiplication every time we need
MTD device size. It is unnecessarily large overhead in terms of speed
and code size.
Did you consider a possibility of just making mtd->size 64 bit?
Or using eraseblock:offset pairs instead of absolute address?
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists