[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0808270847350.17432@lnxricardw.se.axis.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:49:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ricard Wanderlof <ricard.wanderlof@...s.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
cc: Tim Anderson <tanderson@...sta.com>,
"linux-mtd-bounces@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mtd-bounces@...ts.infradead.org>,
"'Bruce Leonard'" <brucle@...thlink.net>,
"Bruce_Leonard@...inc.com" <Bruce_Leonard@...inc.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2][MTD] Add support for > 2GiB MTD devices
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 23:20 -0700, Tim Anderson wrote:
>> I see your point. Ioctls are going away after all.
>>
>> So we should have something like:
>> /sys/class/mtd/mtd0/
>>
>> Or just under device or platform?
>
> Tim, please stop top-posting.
>
> I'm not sure I'd say I _vetoed_ new ioctls, but I certainly expressed a
> desire to do all the information stuff through sysfs. We would need a
> new MEMERASE64 ioctl though.
If the (lack of) sysfs stuff is standing between us and a nice >4GiB mtd I
for one would think that a set of 64-bit ioctls would be a reasonable
halfway house.
/Ricard
--
Ricard Wolf Wanderlöf ricardw(at)axis.com
Axis Communications AB, Lund, Sweden www.axis.com
Phone +46 46 272 2016 Fax +46 46 13 61 30
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists