linux-kernel - Locking API testsuite: Failures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <804dabb00808261727o3ba1f3c0xc25d27ad0694aab4@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:27:32 +0800
From:	"Peter Teoh" <htmldeveloper@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Locking API testsuite: Failures

[    0.000999] | Locking API testsuite:
[    0.000999] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[    0.000999]                                  | spin |wlock |rlock
|mutex | wsem | rsem |
[    0.000999]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[    0.000999]                      A-A deadlock:failed|failed|  ok
|failed|failed|failed|
[    0.000999]                  A-B-B-A deadlock:failed|failed|  ok
|failed|failed|failed|
[    0.000999]              A-B-B-C-C-A deadlock:failed|failed|  ok
|failed|failed|failed|
[    0.000999]              A-B-C-A-B-C deadlock:failed|failed|  ok
|failed|failed|failed|
[    0.000999]          A-B-B-C-C-D-D-A deadlock:failed|failed|  ok
|failed|failed|failed|
[    0.000999]          A-B-C-D-B-D-D-A deadlock:failed|failed|  ok
|failed|failed|failed|
[    0.000999]          A-B-C-D-B-C-D-A deadlock:failed|failed|  ok
|failed|failed|failed|
[    0.000999]                     double
unlock:failed|failed|failed|failed|failed|failed|
[    0.000999]                   initialize
held:failed|failed|failed|failed|failed|failed|
[    0.000999]                  bad unlock order:  ok  |  ok  |  ok  |
 ok  |  ok  |  ok  |
[    0.000999]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[    0.000999]               recursive read-lock:             |  ok  |
            |failed|
[    0.000999]            recursive read-lock #2:             |  ok  |
            |failed|
[    0.000999]             mixed read-write-lock:             |failed|
            |failed|
[    0.000999]             mixed write-read-lock:             |failed|
            |failed|
[    0.000999]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[    0.000999]      hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/12:failed|failed|  ok  |
[    0.000999]      soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/12:failed|failed|  ok  |
[    0.000999]      hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21:failed|failed|  ok  |
[    0.000999]      soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21:failed|failed|  ok  |
[    0.000999]        sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/12:failed|failed|  ok  |
[    0.000999]        sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/21:failed|failed|  ok  |
[    0.000999]          hard-safe-A + irqs-on/12:failed|failed|  ok  |
[    0.000999]          soft-safe-A + irqs-on/12:failed|failed|  ok  |
[    0.000999]          hard-safe-A + irqs-on/21:failed|failed|  ok  |
[    0.000999]          soft-safe-A + irqs-on/21:failed|failed|  ok  |
[    0.000999]     hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123:failed|failed|  ok  |
[    0.000999]     soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123:failed|failed|  ok  |

truncated....

I am just curious what does all these failures imply?

thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Peter Teoh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/