[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080828105616.GA24515@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:56:16 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@...angeworlds.co.uk>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] ACPI BIOS Guideline for Linux
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:41:28AM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 August 2008 22:29:15 Carlos Corbacho wrote:
> > Perhaps it would be more useful to suggest to vendors/ BIOS writers what
> > they should use here instead?
>
> They can use their own devices.
> There is a section about if you provide your own device, document it, etc.:
>
> 2 Vendor specific ACPI implementations
> ...
> 2. If new devices or functions are introduced, document how to use them. A
> short specification or a request for comments (RFC) can form the basis of
> a new standard which follows your needs.
>
>
> But yes, it could be pointed out clearer.
> I'll look closer at it when I touch it the next time.
> Text snippets/suggestions are also appreciated.
A documented WMI interface is easier to use than an entirely custom
documented interface, and reduces the amount of work the vendor has to
do in Windows. To be honest, I think it's the sort of thing we should be
encouraging.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists