[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080828135245.GA12410@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:52:45 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Osterlund <petero2@...ia.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc4-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.26
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:40:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Peter Osterlund wrote:
> >
> > Why not just revert the offending change and try again during the next
> > merge window, assuming someone has figured out an acceptable way to
> > handle this mess by then?
>
> Well,, for 2.6.27 that's what we'll have to do. But there's actually a
> real problem here - the unlocked ioctl's (which we _should_ prefer) have a
> strictly weaker and worse interface. I also wonder if any other
> block_ioctl users were converted..
Actually both interfaces are a fscking disaster. The right things to
pass is neither and inode nor a file but a struct block_device. Al had
all this work done a while and it just needs rebasing to a current tree:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/viro/bdev.git;a=summary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists