[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48B6DF1E.7460.1183C391@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:23:43 +0200
From: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@...uni-regensburg.de>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SLES10 SP1 (x86_64): Hard-hang when using NFSv4 from HP-UX
On 28 Aug 2008 at 13:37, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>
> > I'm fighting for a while with using NFSv4 provided by HP-UX 11.31 (ONCplus
> > B.11.31.04 (ONC+ 2.3)) on a SLES10 SP1 (x86_64) client. HP's NFS is basically that
> > from Sun. The problems are:
> [ ... ]
> > Mounting the filesystems as NFSv3 causes no problems at all, using NFSv4 makes
> > every file open() attempt to hang hard. I must "kill -9" the processes. Even
> > "umount -vat nfs4" hangs on umount().
>
> Sorry, but this mailinglist would be appropriate only if this happens
> still with current vanilla kernel.
>
> Otherwise, you should report this problem to your vendor (Novell bugzilla
> in this case).
Hi!
(ingoring the fact your opinion may be influenced by SUSE/Novell)
Are you saying that SUSE/Novell added bugs regarding NFS4 that are not present in
the vanilla kernel, or are you saying that the vanilla kernel may have fixed NFSv4
bugs that SUSE/Novell did not fix? Why shouldn't anybody be interested in the fact
that there are problems?
Regards,
Ulrich
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists