linux-kernel - Re: [patch] file capabilities: Add no_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080828170938.GA13286@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:09:38 -0500
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To:	"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] file capabilities: Add no_file_caps switch

Quoting Andrew G. Morgan (morgan@...nel.org):
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sorry to get to this late.
>
> I very much prefer this patch over the resuscitation of the cap_set_pg()
> code.
>
> [I would also like to advocate we combine it with making
> CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=y the default config option.]

I certainly don't mind that, but I would expect complaints about this
unless the default boot option were 'n'.

Do you think it's worth sending as a separate trivial patch?  Then if
people object to one both changes won't be held up.

(Anyway that's what I'll do right now)

-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/