[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080828202750.GB16462@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:27:50 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 09:40:47PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 08:32:23PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>>> How do you feel about this patch? It's all about making kmemcheck more
>>> useful... and not much else. Does it have any chance of entering the
>>> kernel along with kmemcheck (when/if that happens)?
>>
>> DEFINE_BITFIELD is horrible.
>
> Heh, heh, one alternative is to have a kmemcheck_memset() thingy that
> unconditionally zeroes bit fields and maybe is a no-op when kmemcheck is
> disabled.
This sounds as if this might cause bugs to disappear when debugging gets
turned on?
Or do I miss anything?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists