lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48B7C2D5.2060209@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:35:17 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH] block: don't test for partition size in bdget_disk() and
 blk_lookup_devt()

bdget_disk() and blk_lookup_devt() never cared whether the specified
partition (or disk) is zero sized or not.  I got confused while
converting those not to depend on consecutive minor numbers in commit
5a6411b1178baf534aa9138052864dfa89d3eada and later when dev0 was added
it broke callers which expected to get valid return for zero sized
disk devices.

So, they never needed nr_sects checks in the first place.  Kill them.

This problem was spotted and debugged by Bartlmoiej Zolnierkiewicz.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
---
Thanks for the good spotting.  I got confused between the meaning of
!part and !part->nr_sects and added the wrong check during conversion.
I audited the rest and it seems those two are the only ones.

Thanks.

 block/genhd.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: work/block/genhd.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/block/genhd.c
+++ work/block/genhd.c
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ extern struct block_device *bdget_disk(s
 	struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
 
 	part = disk_get_part(disk, partno);
-	if (part && (part->nr_sects || partno == 0))
+	if (part)
 		bdev = bdget(part_devt(part));
 	disk_put_part(part);
 
@@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ dev_t blk_lookup_devt(const char *name,
 			continue;
 
 		part = disk_get_part(disk, partno);
-		if (part && (part->nr_sects || partno == 0)) {
+		if (part) {
 			devt = part_devt(part);
 			disk_put_part(part);
 			break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ