lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:07:08 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
	tglx@...x.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] select: return accurate remainer in select() and
 ppoll()


From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:40:29 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] select: return accurate remainer in select() and ppoll()

On Linux, select() and ppoll() write back the time remaining into the timeout
value. Now that we have a nanosecond level end time, we can also give a very
accurate remainder back; this patch adds the logic to do this.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
---
 fs/compat.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 fs/select.c |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/compat.c b/fs/compat.c
index 7c9b2a1..b7c68f1 100644
--- a/fs/compat.c
+++ b/fs/compat.c
@@ -1615,11 +1615,22 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_select(int n, compat_ulong_t __user *inp,
 
 	if (tvp) {
 		struct compat_timeval rtv;
+		struct timespec now;
 
 		if (current->personality & STICKY_TIMEOUTS)
 			goto sticky;
 		rtv.tv_usec = jiffies_to_usecs(do_div((*(u64*)&timeout), HZ));
 		rtv.tv_sec = timeout;
+
+		ktime_get_ts(&now);
+		now = timespec_sub(end_time, now);
+		if (now.tv_sec < 0 || now.tv_nsec < 0) {
+			memset(&rtv, 0, sizeof(rtv));
+		} else {
+			rtv.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
+			rtv.tv_usec = now.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC;
+		}
+
 		if (compat_timeval_compare(&rtv, &tv) >= 0)
 			rtv = tv;
 		if (copy_to_user(tvp, &rtv, sizeof(rtv))) {
@@ -1697,16 +1708,20 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_pselect7(int n, compat_ulong_t __user *inp,
 
 	if (tsp) {
 		struct compat_timespec rts;
+		struct timespec now;
 
 		if (current->personality & STICKY_TIMEOUTS)
 			goto sticky;
 
-		rts.tv_sec = timeout / HZ;
-		rts.tv_nsec = (timeout % HZ) * (NSEC_PER_SEC/HZ);
-		if (rts.tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
-			rts.tv_sec++;
-			rts.tv_nsec -= NSEC_PER_SEC;
+		ktime_get_ts(&now);
+		now = timespec_sub(end_time, now);
+		if (now.tv_sec < 0 || now.tv_nsec < 0) {
+			memset(&rts, 0, sizeof(rts));
+		} else {
+			rts.tv_nsec = now.tv_nsec;
+			rts.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
 		}
+
 		if (compat_timespec_compare(&rts, &ts) >= 0)
 			rts = ts;
 		if (copy_to_user(tsp, &rts, sizeof(rts))) {
@@ -1818,13 +1833,19 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_ppoll(struct pollfd __user *ufds,
 
 	if (tsp && timeout >= 0) {
 		struct compat_timespec rts;
+		struct timespec now;
 
 		if (current->personality & STICKY_TIMEOUTS)
 			goto sticky;
-		/* Yes, we know it's actually an s64, but it's also positive. */
-		rts.tv_nsec = jiffies_to_usecs(do_div((*(u64*)&timeout), HZ)) *
-					1000;
-		rts.tv_sec = timeout;
+		ktime_get_ts(&now);
+		now = timespec_sub(end_time, now);
+		if (now.tv_sec < 0 || now.tv_nsec < 0) {
+			memset(&rts, 0, sizeof(rts));
+		} else {
+			rts.tv_nsec = now.tv_nsec;
+			rts.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
+		}
+
 		if (compat_timespec_compare(&rts, &ts) >= 0)
 			rts = ts;
 		if (copy_to_user(tsp, &rts, sizeof(rts))) {
diff --git a/fs/select.c b/fs/select.c
index 6a6e33a..3ce5943 100644
--- a/fs/select.c
+++ b/fs/select.c
@@ -409,13 +409,24 @@ asmlinkage long sys_select(int n, fd_set __user *inp, fd_set __user *outp,
 
 	if (tvp) {
 		struct timeval rtv;
+		struct timespec now;
 
 		if (current->personality & STICKY_TIMEOUTS)
 			goto sticky;
-		rtv.tv_usec = jiffies_to_usecs(do_div((*(u64*)&timeout), HZ));
-		rtv.tv_sec = timeout;
+
+		ktime_get_ts(&now);
+		now = timespec_sub(end_time, now);
+		if (now.tv_sec < 0 || now.tv_nsec < 0) {
+			rtv.tv_usec = 0;
+			rtv.tv_sec = 0;
+		} else {
+			rtv.tv_usec = now.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC;
+			rtv.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
+		}
+
 		if (timeval_compare(&rtv, &tv) >= 0)
 			rtv = tv;
+
 		if (copy_to_user(tvp, &rtv, sizeof(rtv))) {
 sticky:
 			/*
@@ -481,15 +492,24 @@ asmlinkage long sys_pselect7(int n, fd_set __user *inp, fd_set __user *outp,
 	ret = core_sys_select(n, inp, outp, exp, &timeout, &end_time);
 
 	if (tsp) {
-		struct timespec rts;
+		struct timespec rts, now;
 
 		if (current->personality & STICKY_TIMEOUTS)
 			goto sticky;
-		rts.tv_nsec = jiffies_to_usecs(do_div((*(u64*)&timeout), HZ)) *
-						1000;
-		rts.tv_sec = timeout;
+
+		ktime_get_ts(&now);
+		now = timespec_sub(end_time, now);
+		if (now.tv_sec < 0 || now.tv_nsec < 0) {
+			rts.tv_nsec = 0;
+			rts.tv_sec = 0;
+		} else {
+			rts.tv_nsec = now.tv_nsec;
+			rts.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
+		}
+
 		if (timespec_compare(&rts, &ts) >= 0)
 			rts = ts;
+
 		if (copy_to_user(tsp, &rts, sizeof(rts))) {
 sticky:
 			/*
@@ -847,16 +867,21 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ppoll(struct pollfd __user *ufds, unsigned int nfds,
 		sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &sigsaved, NULL);
 
 	if (tsp && timeout >= 0) {
-		struct timespec rts;
+		struct timespec rts, now;
 
 		if (current->personality & STICKY_TIMEOUTS)
 			goto sticky;
-		/* Yes, we know it's actually an s64, but it's also positive. */
-		rts.tv_nsec = jiffies_to_usecs(do_div((*(u64*)&timeout), HZ)) *
-						1000;
-		rts.tv_sec = timeout;
+
+		ktime_get_ts(&now);
+		now = timespec_sub(end_time, now);
+		if (now.tv_sec < 0 || now.tv_nsec < 0)
+			memset(&rts, 0, sizeof(rts));
+		else
+			rts = now;
+
 		if (timespec_compare(&rts, &ts) >= 0)
 			rts = ts;
+
 		if (copy_to_user(tsp, &rts, sizeof(rts))) {
 		sticky:
 			/*
-- 
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ