[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080829152733.GA20151@finial.ellipticsemi.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:27:33 -0400
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...ipticsemi.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, miklos@...redi.hu,
greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] CUSE: implement CUSE - Character device in
Userspace
On 04:09 Fri 29 Aug , Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Andrew.
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> +struct cuse_conn {
> >> + struct fuse_conn fc;
> >> + struct cdev cdev;
> >> + struct vfsmount *mnt;
> >> + struct device *dev;
> >> + bool cdev_added:1;
> >> + bool disconnected:1; /* channel disconnected */
> >
> > I didn't know you could do that with bools.
>
> Hmm... I thought it was like any other integral types, no?
>
Boolean bit-fields are indeed valid. Usual semantics for objects of type
_Bool apply.
C99 6.7.2.1 Structure and union specifiers
4 A bit-field shall have a type that is a qualified or unqualified
version of _Bool, signed int, unsigned int, or some other
implementation-defined type.
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Semiconductor (http://www.ellipticsemi.com/)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists