[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0808291233280.17917@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:34:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> Im running it on a x86_64 box as we speak. How can I tell if there is a
> >> certain mode that is permitting this?
> >>
> >
> > If the boot up says you're running with PMtimer then it uses the fallback
> > (usually happens on pre Fam10h AMD boxes). A typical Intel box
> > would use the faster ring 3 only TSC path and then explode with your
> > change I bet.
> >
> > Or step with gdb through gettimeofday() and see if it does a syscall.
> >
> > -Andi
> >
>
> It seems to be running fine with no indication it has fallen back.
> Perhaps I need a certain workload to bring out the issue?
Perhaps you never hit the slow path in userland. That's the only place it
would write. Perhaps add a dummy static variable in the fast path, and
write to it. See if that crashes you apps.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists