[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080829170851.GZ26610@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:08:51 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
No idea on the problem itself because I don't understand it, just:
> Given that, we either need to address the const requirement
> for userspace, alter userspace's usage, or find another way to address
> the deadlock. Any ideas?
In the worst case you can always disable the vsyscall gtod() and
thus the need for a user space safe seqlock_t, but it will
hurt some workloads significantly.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists