[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080829180623.GA22247@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:06:23 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: torvalds@...l.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
Subject: [PATCH] Don't trigger softlockup detector on network fs blocked tasks
Don't trigger softlockup detector on network fs blocked tasks
Pulling the ethernet cable on a 2.6.27-rc system with NFS mounts
currently leads to an ongoing flood of soft lockup detector backtraces
for all tasks blocked on the NFS mounts when the hickup takes
longer than 120s.
I don't think NFS problems should be all that noisy.
Luckily there's a reasonably easy way to distingush this case.
Don't report task softlockup warnings for tasks in TASK_KILLABLE
state, which is used by the network file systems.
I believe this patch is a 2.6.27 candidate.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Index: linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc/kernel/softlockup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc.orig/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -180,6 +180,10 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_
if (t->flags & PF_FROZEN)
return;
+ /* Don't check for tasks waiting on network file systems like NFS */
+ if (t->state & TASK_KILLABLE)
+ return;
+
if (switch_count != t->last_switch_count || !t->last_switch_timestamp) {
t->last_switch_count = switch_count;
t->last_switch_timestamp = now;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists