[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48B83C27.3090908@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:12:55 -0400
From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To: andi@...stfloor.org
CC: mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [RT PATCH v2] seqlock: serialize against writers
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> *Patch submitted for inclusion in PREEMPT_RT 26-rt4. Applies to 2.6.26.3-rt3*
>
> Hi Ingo, Steven, Thomas,
> Please consider for -rt4. This fixes a nasty deadlock on my systems under
> heavy load.
>
> [
> Changelog:
> v2: only touch seqlock_t because raw_seqlock_t doesn't require
> serialization and userspace cannot modify data during a read
>
> v1: initial release
> ]
>
Hi Andi,
As it turns out, my distcc backend was an x86_64 machine running the
v1 patch and I started to notice sometime today that certain cc1 jobs
were sometimes (albeit rarely) segfaulting on me. I noticed that before
I even published the first patch, but I chalked it up to a corrupt .o on
my NFS home. Plus I was forgetting that the distcc machine was running
the patch, and I would probably have never made the userspace connection
had you not mentioned it. In any case, I self-built this v2 patch with
v2 applied, and the segfaults have gone away. So I think we know
several things:
1) You were right that this would cause an issue if the slow path is hit.
2) Steven was right that userspace must use raw_seqlock_t because it no
longer crashes with v2.
3) I am satisfied that my primary concern is still properly addressed.
Hopefully everyone is satisfied with this patch now.
Thanks for the help. It's much appreciated!
-Greg
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (258 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists