linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ne.c msleep not mdelay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080830155826.06743636@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:58:26 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	David Fries <david@...es.net>
Cc:	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	p_gortmaker@...oo.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ne.c msleep not mdelay

> I was just going to make the argument that any task that could be run
> during msleep, could just as easily run on the other cpu in mdelay (if
> there was one).

ISA bus auto-probing doesn't actually work at all well on SMP. The number
of people who have ever been affected by that has always been effectively
nil.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/