| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <a08621850808291848q5660148fx57d576ecfcbfce8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 03:48:39 +0200
From: "Dushan Tcholich" <dusanc@...il.com>
To: "Francois Romieu" <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: "Robert Hancock" <hancockr@...w.ca>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ksoftirqd high cpu load on kernels 2.6.24 to 2.6.27-rc1-mm1
Hello again
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Dushan Tcholich <dusanc@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Dushan Tcholich <dusanc@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>> Sorry for answering this late, but I was short on time and couldn't
>> get reiser4 to work with 2.6.27-rc2
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> wrote:
>>> Dushan Tcholich <dusanc@...il.com> :
>>> [...]
>>>> I googled a little and found out that oprofile is a little above my head.
>>>> So as I thought that some driver or HW might be responsible for this I
>>>> tried to disable various onboard HW and found out that if I disable
>>>> onboard ethernet problem dissapears, so now I've added netdev and
>>>> maintainer of R8169 driver to cc.
>>>
>>> Can you try 2.6.27-rc2 and send the content of /proc/interrupts, dmesg,
>>> ifconfig as well as a capture of the strange output from top ?
>>>
>
> I tried some more kernels and I had the same problem with 2.6.23.17
> and 2.6.27-rc1-mm1, but I couldn't reproduce it with kernel from
> sysresccd 1.0.1 http://www.sysresccd.org/ which is a patched version
> of 2.6.24 i think .7 when I booted it to change fs.
> Could it be that something in userspace is creating this?
>
I dug a little more and found out some new info.
Unsolved bugreport with same symptoms:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119613299024398&w=2
Problems appear if I start br0 interface, as context switch rate
increases 200 times. If I start eth0 instead everything looks ok.
The bugreport above had bridging enabled too.
When using eth0 I get:
vmstat -n 1 10
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
2 0 17720 162288 25024 576852 0 0 21 22 6 9 10 4 85 0
0 0 17720 162196 25024 576880 0 0 0 0 13 473 0 0 99 0
0 0 17720 162196 25028 576880 0 0 0 4 36 1122 1 0 99 0
0 0 17720 162196 25028 576880 0 0 0 0 83 844 0 0 99 0
0 0 17720 162196 25028 576880 0 0 0 0 55 691 1 0 99 0
0 0 17720 162556 25028 576880 0 0 0 0 13 490 1 0 100 0
0 0 17720 162100 25028 576880 0 0 0 0 39 561 6 0 94 0
1 0 17720 162028 25028 576880 0 0 0 0 16 1030 4 0 96 0
0 0 17720 162028 25028 576880 0 0 0 0 40 597 1 0 99 0
0 0 17720 162028 25028 576880 0 0 0 0 12 512 2 0 97 0
top
top - 03:30:07 up 6 days, 5:40, 4 users, load average: 0.02, 0.11, 0.28
Tasks: 149 total, 2 running, 147 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 12.1%us, 3.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 84.6%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 1033388k total, 871336k used, 162052k free, 25016k buffers
Swap: 610460k total, 17720k used, 592740k free, 576852k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
4 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 554:23.44 ksoftirqd/0
If I use br0 I get:
vmstat -n 1 10
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
0 0 17720 162112 25048 577120 0 0 21 22 6 11 10 4 86 0
0 0 17720 162152 25048 577120 0 0 0 0 14 111082 0 3 97 0
0 0 17720 162152 25048 577120 0 0 0 0 23 107134 1 3 96 0
1 0 17720 160148 25048 577120 0 0 0 0 11 109888 2 3 95 0
0 0 17720 162032 25048 577120 0 0 0 0 33 108163 1 2 97 0
0 0 17720 162032 25048 577120 0 0 0 0 7 104642 2 2 95 0
0 0 17720 162020 25048 577120 0 0 0 0 41 109135 0 2 98 0
0 0 17720 162036 25048 577120 0 0 0 0 9 105133 0 3 96 0
0 0 17720 162020 25048 577120 0 0 0 0 42 107605 1 2 97 0
1 0 17720 162032 25048 577120 0 0 0 0 5 110768 0 2 98 0
top
top - 03:32:03 up 6 days, 5:41, 4 users, load average: 0.09, 0.10, 0.26
Tasks: 148 total, 2 running, 146 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 4.8%us, 2.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 93.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 1033388k total, 871564k used, 161824k free, 25048k buffers
Swap: 610460k total, 17720k used, 592740k free, 577120k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
11489 dusan 20 0 235m 85m 24m R 6 8.5 1:03.51 firefox
4 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 7 0.0 554:24.04 ksoftirqd/0
I start br0 like this in /etc/conf.d/net
bridge_br0="eth0"
config_eth0=( "null" )
config_br0=( "192.168.1.3/24" )
RC_NEED_br0="net.eth0"
brctl_br0=( "setfd 0" "sethello 0" "stp off" )
#routes_br0=( "default gw 192.168.1.3" )
depend_br0() {
need net.eth0
}
I start eth0 like this in /etc/conf.d/net
config_eth0=( "192.168.1.3/24" )
>> I've copied my root to ext3 partition and with vanilla 2.6.27-rc2 I got:
>> -With my .config problem is still here
>> -With only rtl8169 removed from config there is no problem
>>
>>> It seems rather benign though.
>>>
>> Well I wouldn't agree from power managment standpoint :). This nic is
>> in a lot of laptops.
>> 8% of 2.13GHz Core2Duo CPU is a lot :)
>>
>> Btw. should LKML be removed from cc?
>> If you need any more help please ask.
>> I hope I'm not harrasing you too much :)
>>> --
>>> Ueimor
>>>
>> Have a nice day
>> Dushan
>>
> ...
>
Have a nice day
Dushan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists