[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1220132749.3615.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:45:49 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi/sd: Fix size output in MB
On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 22:59 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:45:16 -0600
> Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
>
> >
> > 2. We should report in GB or TB when appropriate. The exact definition
> > of 'appropriate' is going to vary from person to person. Might I
> > suggest that we should report between two and four significant digits.
> > eg 9543 MB is ok, 10543 MB should be 10 GB.
> >
>
> I've been looking at doing something like this for the mmc_block
> driver, so a generic helper is welcome. :)
Does MMC have the 10^3 requirement like SCSI/ATA disks do, or can you
use 2^10 like standard computer stuff for capacities?
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists