[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080831001314.694df795@mjolnir.drzeus.cx>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 00:13:14 +0200
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi/sd: Fix size output in MB
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:45:49 -0500
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 22:59 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:45:16 -0600
> > Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > 2. We should report in GB or TB when appropriate. The exact definition
> > > of 'appropriate' is going to vary from person to person. Might I
> > > suggest that we should report between two and four significant digits.
> > > eg 9543 MB is ok, 10543 MB should be 10 GB.
> > >
> >
> > I've been looking at doing something like this for the mmc_block
> > driver, so a generic helper is welcome. :)
>
> Does MMC have the 10^3 requirement like SCSI/ATA disks do, or can you
> use 2^10 like standard computer stuff for capacities?
>
Some do, some don't. I prefer the 2^10 and MiB variants as it avoids
ambiguity.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists