linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for August 27

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48B90E81.5060905@kernel.org>
Date:	Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:10:25 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
CC:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 27

Hello,

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>>> Hmmm... it broke booting?  Bart, can you please elaborate a bit what got
>>> broken?  Did it fail to locate the root partition or were you using
>>> static device nodes?
>> It works fine for me, fwiw.
> 
> It fails to locate the root partition if you are using the default root
> device on x86 (the one hard-wired into bzImage, it uses hard-coded 8-bit
> major/minor numbers).

Right.  That would break it too.

> Now I see that the issue is easily fixed by passing the root device name
> with "root=" (since it will figure out the actual major/minor numbers
> later) and that the default root device is said to be deprecated according
> to Documentation/x86/boot.txt (OTOH there is no warning at all that it is
> deprecated and that you should be using "root=" so I'm not convinced that
> I'm the only one who would hit the unfortunate combination).

Yeap, in retrospect, enabling BLOCK_EXT_DEVT by default seems too
disruptive.  There also are people running off static /dev.  I hope
distros enable it during their alphas and betas tho so that they can
spot problems in configuration utilities and stuff early.

> Actually it seems that CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT introduction (which I
> think is a nice step forward) is a good oportunity to put the deprecation
> of the default root device further, i.e. it may be worth to hook the
> default root device check and/or CONFIG_DEBUG_BLOCK_EXT_DEVT one into
> mount_block_root().

Maybe we can add a warning there if BLOCK_EXT_DEVT is enabled or do
you have something else on mind?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/