[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080830095906.6cad8647@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:59:06 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David Fries <david@...es.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
p_gortmaker@...oo.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ne.c msleep not mdelay
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:44:53 -0500
David Fries <david@...es.net> wrote:
> mdelay(10) replaced by msleep(10) to give up the CPU, it's just
> waiting for an interrupt, so timing isn't critical.
It is too critical for a reschedule to occur.
NAK this one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists