[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200808311805.57395.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:05:56 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide: Two fixes regarding memory allocation
On Friday 29 August 2008, Elias Oltmanns wrote:
> In function ide_devset_execute() we should use __GFP_WAIT rather than
> GFP_KERNEL. Also, the allocation cannot possibly fail at that point.
> More importantly, there is a potential memory leak in the device probing
> code. The infrastructure seems rather complex and I hope I haven't messed
> anything up by trying to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>
thanks, applied
> @@ -972,12 +972,21 @@ static void ide_port_setup_devices(ide_hwif_t *hwif)
> if (ide_init_queue(drive)) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "ide: failed to init %s\n",
> drive->name);
> + spin_lock_irq(&ide_lock);
> + kfree(drive->id);
> + drive->id = NULL;
> + drive->dev_flags &= ~IDE_DFLAG_PRESENT;
> + spin_unlock_irq(&ide_lock);
> continue;
ide_lock taking is superfluous here, I removed it while merging the patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists