lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080831193037.GB14876@fieldses.org>
Date:	Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:30:37 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
Cc:	Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...il.com>,
	Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, neilb@...e.de,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
	PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: NFS regression? Odd delays and lockups accessing an NFS export.

On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 04:47:41PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 09:43 -0500, Tom Tucker wrote:
> > Sure. I've actually tried to reproduce it here unsuccessfully.
> > 
> > As a starter, I would suggest turning on transport debugging:
> > 
> > # echo 256 > /proc/sys/sunrpc/rpc_debug
> > [...]
> > If Ian is willing to create the log (or already has one), I'm
> > certainly willing to look at it.
> 
> It produced only the following (is that what was expected?):
> 
> [146866.448112] -pid- proc flgs status -client- -prog- --rqstp- -timeout -rpcwait -action- ---ops--
> [146866.448112] 30576 0001 00a0      0 f77a1600 100003 f7903340    15000 xprt_pending fa0ba88e fa0c9df4
> [146866.448112] 30577 0004 0080    -11 f77a1600 100003 f7903000        0 xprt_sending fa0ba88e fa0c9df4

It's normal to get something like that when you turn it on, yes (unless
someone else spots anything odd about that...) but what's really needed
is to turn this on and then reproduce the problem--it's the debugging
output that goes to the logs during the problem that'll be interesting.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ