[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0808311411450.6096@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 14:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tglx@...x.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [patch v2 0/5] Nano/Microsecond resolution for select() and
poll()
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Note:
> even though poll() (as opposed to ppoll()) only accepts milliseconds
> as userspace interface, the behavior will still improve because the current
> time no longer needs to be rounded up to the next jiffie, so on average
> a 500 microseconds behavior improvement.
Another way to get down in the timeout resolution for newer kernels, and
still supporting the syscalls with millisec timeouts, is to use timerfds.
- Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists