linux-kernel - [PATCH] UBIFS: fix zero-length truncations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1220194366-12731-2-git-send-email-dedekind@infradead.org>
Date:	Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:52:35 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To:	linux-fsdevel-owner@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] UBIFS: fix zero-length truncations

From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>

Always allow truncations to zero, even if budgeting thinks there
is no space. UBIFS reserves some space for deletions anyway.

Otherwise, the following happans:
1. create a file, and write as much as possible there, until ENOSPC
2. truncate the file, which fails with ENOSPC, which is not good.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
---
 fs/ubifs/dir.c  |    1 -
 fs/ubifs/file.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
index 5c96f1f..2b267c9 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
@@ -587,7 +587,6 @@ static int ubifs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
 	if (err) {
 		if (err != -ENOSPC)
 			return err;
-		err = 0;
 		budgeted = 0;
 	}
 
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/file.c b/fs/ubifs/file.c
index 4071d1c..3d698e2 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c
@@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ static int do_truncation(struct ubifs_info *c, struct inode *inode,
 	int err;
 	struct ubifs_budget_req req;
 	loff_t old_size = inode->i_size, new_size = attr->ia_size;
-	int offset = new_size & (UBIFS_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
+	int offset = new_size & (UBIFS_BLOCK_SIZE - 1), budgeted = 1;
 	struct ubifs_inode *ui = ubifs_inode(inode);
 
 	dbg_gen("ino %lu, size %lld -> %lld", inode->i_ino, old_size, new_size);
@@ -811,8 +811,15 @@ static int do_truncation(struct ubifs_info *c, struct inode *inode,
 	/* A funny way to budget for truncation node */
 	req.dirtied_ino_d = UBIFS_TRUN_NODE_SZ;
 	err = ubifs_budget_space(c, &req);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
+	if (err) {
+		/*
+		 * Treat truncations to zero as deletion and always allow them,
+		 * just like we do for '->unlink()'.
+		 */
+		if (new_size || err != -ENOSPC)
+			return err;
+		budgeted = 0;
+	}
 
 	err = vmtruncate(inode, new_size);
 	if (err)
@@ -869,7 +876,12 @@ static int do_truncation(struct ubifs_info *c, struct inode *inode,
 	err = ubifs_jnl_truncate(c, inode, old_size, new_size);
 	mutex_unlock(&ui->ui_mutex);
 out_budg:
-	ubifs_release_budget(c, &req);
+	if (budgeted)
+		ubifs_release_budget(c, &req);
+	else {
+		c->nospace = c->nospace_rp = 0;
+		smp_wmb();
+	}
 	return err;
 }
 
-- 
1.5.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/