[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1220262187.2982.58.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:43:07 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBIFS: fill f_fsid
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 17:52 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
>
> UBIFS stores 16-bit UUID in the superblock, and it is a good
> idea to return part of it in 'f_fsid' filed of kstatfs structure.
I think you mean a 16-byte UUID, not 16-bit?
> + memcpy(&buf->f_fsid, c->uuid, sizeof(__kernel_fsid_t));
For btrfs I xor the first 64 bits with the second 64 bits, and put
_that_ into f_fsid. You're just putting the first 64 bits in and
ignoring the second 64 bits. Neither is really _better_ than the other;
you just alter the circumstances in which you get collisions. But I
suppose we might as well be consistent about how we do it?
(Actually I XOR in the root object ID for the subvol too, but you don't
need to worry about that).
Alternatively, there's space in the struct statfs to export a couple
more uint32_ts, and thus the _whole_ of the uuid. Perhaps we should do
that?
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists