[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809011348.29917.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 13:48:29 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #11438] Upcoming oops in lockdep
On Monday, 1 of September 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 23:36:45 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 21:50 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > > know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11438
> > > Subject : Upcoming oops in lockdep
> > > Submitter : Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
> > > Date : 2008-08-23 20:49 (8 days old)
> > > References :
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121952463613140&w=4
> > > http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=mark_lock
> > > Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> >
> > as far as I'm concerned this has nothing to do with lockdep
> >
> >
>
> yeah the pattern increasing looks like a fedora special; eg the fedora
> utrace patches seem to be utter bust. As long as we keep utrace out of
> mainline we're fine ;-)
Should I close it, then?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists