[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1220277616.6499.119.camel@odin>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:00:16 +0100
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...nel.org>
To: Alan Horstmann <gineera@...ect135.co.uk>
Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>, Cliff Cai <cliff.cai@...log.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, liam.girdwood@...fsonmicro.com,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/4] ASOC: WM8731 codec: add SPI support
as well as I2C
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 14:52 +0100, Alan Horstmann wrote:
> We have just started trying this out as an alternative to i2c, and picked out
> the following:
>
> On Wednesday 27 August 2008 10:39, Bryan Wu wrote:
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_I2C) || defined(CONFIG_I2C_MODULE)
> > +#if defined (CONFIG_I2C) || defined (CONFIG_I2C_MODULE) && !defined
> > (CONFIG_SND_SOC_WM8731_SPI)
>
> I think this needs extra brackets round the ||'s before the && thus:
>
> > +#if (defined (CONFIG_I2C) || defined (CONFIG_I2C_MODULE)) && !defined
> > (CONFIG_SND_SOC_WM8731_SPI)
>
> in order to force use of SPI when (CONFIG_SND_SOC_WM8731_SPI) and (CONFIG_I2C)
> are both defined. Or have we misunderstood the intention? This is in 2
> other places also in the patch.
>
It may be simpler to only have CONFIG_SND_SOC_WM8731_SPI and
CONFIG_SND_SOC_WM8731_I2C definitions for all the codec drivers. These
would be set by machine Kconfig.
Liam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists