[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1220281088.8426.63.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:58:08 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] sched_clock: fix NOHZ interaction
Avi, the below fixes it for me..
---
Subject: sched_clock: fix NOHZ interaction
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Date: Mon Sep 01 16:44:23 CEST 2008
If HLT stops the TSC, we'll fail to account idle time, thereby inflating the
actual process times. Fix this by re-calibrating the clock against GTOD when
leaving nohz mode.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -162,6 +162,8 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_idle(int cpu)
ts->idle_lastupdate = now;
ts->idle_sleeptime = ktime_add(ts->idle_sleeptime, delta);
ts->idle_active = 0;
+
+ sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(0);
}
}
@@ -177,6 +179,7 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_start_idle(stru
}
ts->idle_entrytime = now;
ts->idle_active = 1;
+ sched_clock_idle_sleep_event();
return now;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists