lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809011545020.12958@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59



On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > 
> > Umm. Which one. The 32-bit or the 64-bit?
> 
> The 32 bit version.

So then the PIT isn't going to work on that machine. Do you have HPET?

Because if so, the most obvious choice would be to say:

 - on old machines, the PIT is likely more reliable than PM_TIMER

 - on new machines, the HPET is likely more reliable than PIT

and there's actually a fairly obvious place to distinguish between old and 
new: if ti has a HPET, consider it a new one.

But that just means that there's never any reason to use PM_TIMER anyway, 
and the proper patch would probably be to just ignore it. No?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ