[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809011545020.12958@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > Umm. Which one. The 32-bit or the 64-bit?
>
> The 32 bit version.
So then the PIT isn't going to work on that machine. Do you have HPET?
Because if so, the most obvious choice would be to say:
- on old machines, the PIT is likely more reliable than PM_TIMER
- on new machines, the HPET is likely more reliable than PIT
and there's actually a fairly obvious place to distinguish between old and
new: if ti has a HPET, consider it a new one.
But that just means that there's never any reason to use PM_TIMER anyway,
and the proper patch would probably be to just ignore it. No?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists