[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809011053.34028.brunel@diku.dk>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:53:33 +0200
From: Julien Brunel <brunel@...u.dk>
To: davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi,
jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] net/xfrm: Use an IS_ERR test rather than a NULL test
From: Julien Brunel <brunel@...u.dk>
In case of error, the function xfrm_bundle_create returns an ERR
pointer, but never returns a NULL pointer. So a NULL test that comes
after an IS_ERR test should be deleted.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@match_bad_null_test@
expression x, E;
statement S1,S2;
@@
x = xfrm_bundle_create(...)
... when != x = E
* if (x != NULL)
S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julien Brunel <brunel@...u.dk>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -u -p a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1731,8 +1731,7 @@ restart:
* We can't enlist stable bundles either.
*/
write_unlock_bh(&policy->lock);
- if (dst)
- dst_free(dst);
+ dst_free(dst);
if (pol_dead)
XFRM_INC_STATS(LINUX_MIB_XFRMOUTPOLDEAD);
@@ -1748,8 +1747,7 @@ restart:
err = xfrm_dst_update_origin(dst, fl);
if (unlikely(err)) {
write_unlock_bh(&policy->lock);
- if (dst)
- dst_free(dst);
+ dst_free(dst);
XFRM_INC_STATS(LINUX_MIB_XFRMOUTBUNDLECHECKERROR);
goto error;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists