[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080902090312.7fb3c7b6@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:03:12 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
dwmw2@...radead.org, drepper@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu,
tglx@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] hrtimer: make select() and poll() use the hrtimer
range feature
On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:22:20 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Why not use a simple logarithmic decay to drive this estimate?
or just take a 0.1% of the time ;)
Linus wrote the original, who am I to argue?
(and arguably, it doesn't really matter much, the current code is nice
and simple enough)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists