linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/03] USB-IP patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080902171236.GC9524@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 2008 10:12:36 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	"Brian G. Merrell" <bgmerrell@...ell.com>
Cc:	greg@...ah.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Takahiro Hirofuchi <hirofuchi@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/03] USB-IP patches

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:50:08PM -0600, Brian G. Merrell wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 04:00:16PM -0700, greg@...ah.com wrote:
> > Here's 3 patches that adds USB-IP functionality code to the kernel tree.
> > 
> > It is against 2.6.27-rc4, and has been added to the -staging tree.  If
> > there are no major objections, I'll also queue it up in the usb tree for
> > submission into 2.6.28.
> > 
> > The code is based on Takahiro's great work that has been sitting outside
> > of the kernel for many many years now.  Brian Merrell took the most
> > recent version of the code, cleaned it up and sent it to me.  I did more
> > cleanup and split the patch into 3 pieces, making it a bit easier to
> > work with.
> > 
> > There are still a number of checkpatch.pl warnings/errors emitted, and
> > Brian said he would work on them in the upcoming weeks, but they don't
> > distract from the basic functionality and a good review would be nice to
> > have.
> 
> I will indeed continue to work on getting rid of the checkpatch.pl
> warnings/errors during the upcoming weeks.  I already eliminated the
> ones I could figure out without too much effort;  I am sure the
> remaining ones are trivial to many of you out there, so I welcome
> any suggestions.

The kthread one looks like you will have to change a bit of the code,
all of the other remaining ones should be self-explanatory.  If not,
please let us know and we'll be glad to help out.

Can you also work to address all of the review comments made on the code
so far as well?  I don't know how much time you have to work on this,
but for now I'll let you send me changes and not do anything on the code
myself.  Sound good?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/