[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20080902191333.GL3086@webber.adilger.int>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:13:33 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBIFS: fill f_fsid
On Sep 02, 2008 18:29 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Yes, putting st_dev in f_fsid probably isn't a good thing to do.
>
> I realised that we already have the
> f_fsid field in struct statfs, and we might as well just use that. That
> does seem to be what it was _designed_ for, after all.
My bad - I had looked back in email archives about this issue and got
the export operation solution stuck in my head...
Yes, using f_fsid is the right way to do this, assuming NFSD plays along.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists