[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080902210219.GA9856@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 17:02:20 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBIFS: fill f_fsid
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:09:54AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> The fsid is supposed to be a persistent, unique identifier for the
> filesystem, used by NFS in file handles. Using st_dev is unsafe,
> because that may change from one server boot to the next, because
> of device probing order, driver changes, etc. Also, not all filesystems
> HAVE a valid st_dev in the first place, which is the whole reason
> for this thread.
>
> I think a ->get_fsid() export method would be preferable.
Umm, different things. f_fsid in stat(v)fs is just a cookie exported to
userspac that has never really been documented.
We also called the filesystem part of the NFS filehandle in a few
places, and for those it's correct that it should be stable. Currently
the fsid is either created from the dev_t in kernelspace or from
uuids extracted through libuuid in userspace.
I can't see anything in the message that started this thread that
mentions NFS, btw.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists