[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080902000951.GM1239@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:10:01 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>, "Zhao, Yu" <yu.zhao@...el.com>,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI Hotplug: fakephp: fix deadlock... again
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 12:40:18PM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:
> We get the "slot already scheduled for removal" because that
> particular device has 2 functions, and we're creating slots on a
> per-slot basis now, not a per-function basis.
>
> Although, I wonder, Willy -- is that really the right thing to
> do? Seems like fakephp would be more useful if we did operate on
> a per-function basis, and not per-slot. Especially given Yu's
> work with SR-IOV, where we can apparently have lots of functions
> per a physical device.
I suspect it depends on what you believe the point of fakephp is.
My assumption was that it was a way to fake what would happen if you had
a hotplug controller for a particular slot. In that context, the change
I made was clearly correct. If you want to use it for hot-removing
individual functions from a Linux guest running under a hypervisor
(for example), that's much less useful.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists