[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080902071428.GA6743@alberich.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:14:28 +0200
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86: fix memory leaks when doing CPU hotplug
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:40:15PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com> wrote:
>
> > Following patches fix two memory leaks with CPU hotplug. Some per CPU
> > data is allocated each time a CPU is set online. But this space is
> > never freed.
> >
> > Usually this memory leak is not a big deal (for normal CPU hotplug
> > usage). But during stress tests with lots of CPU offline/online cycles
> > this really matters.
> >
> > The entire leak is 40K (10 pages) for each offline/online cycle per
> > CPU. I've verified both fixes performing more than 90000 CPU
> > offline/online cycles.
>
> applied to tip/x86/core, thanks Andreas.
>
> > This is not a regression but I think it's still 2.6.27 material.
> > Please apply.
>
> it's tricky code so i guess it's best to let it cook in tip/master a
> bit. If it does not show up upstream by say -rc4 time could you please
> ping us about it?
Ping!
It's -rc5 time and
b55793f7528ce1b73c25b3ac8a86a6cda2a0f9a4 (x86: cpu_init(): fix memory leak when using CPU hotplug)
49800efcb17afdf973f33e8aa8807b7f83993cc6 (x86: pda_init(): fix memory leak when using CPU hotplug)
are in tip/master but not yet upstream.
Regards,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists