lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:39:15 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, teheo@...ell.com,
	stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, Martin.Leisner@...ox.com
Subject: Re: autosuspend for SCSI devices

Am Dienstag 02 September 2008 11:08:00 schrieb Pavel Machek:

Hello!

> > /**
> >  * scsi_block_when_processing_errors - Prevent cmds from being queued.
> >  * @sdev:	Device on which we are performing recovery.
> >  *
> >  * Description:
> >  *     We block until the host is out of error recovery, and then check to
> >  *     see whether the host or the device is offline.
> >  *
> >  * Return value:
> >  *     0 when dev was taken offline by error recovery. 1 OK to proceed.
> >  */
> > int scsi_block_when_processing_errors(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> 
> 
> Hmm, scsi_block_when_ function, which does not _block_, and returns

/**
 * scsi_block_when_processing_errors - Prevent cmds from being queued.
 * @sdev:	Device on which we are performing recovery.
 *
 * Description:
 *     We block until the host is out of error recovery, and then check to
 *     see whether the host or the device is offline.
 *
 * Return value:
 *     0 when dev was taken offline by error recovery. 1 OK to proceed.
 */
int scsi_block_when_processing_errors(struct scsi_device *sdev)
{
	int online;

	wait_event(sdev->host->host_wait, !scsi_host_in_recovery(sdev->host));

This I would expect to block. But it may be unwise to block this long.

	online = scsi_device_online(sdev);

	SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(5, printk("%s: rtn: %d\n", __func__,
					  online));

	return online;
}
> inverted values from what would people expect.
> 
> ...but this should fix it, no? [incremental to previous]
> 									Pavel
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c
> index 3c184fe..7e5ea0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_pm.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #define DEBUG
>  #include <scsi/scsi.h>
>  #include <scsi/scsi_device.h>
>  #include <scsi/scsi_host.h>
> +#include <scsi/scsi_eh.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  
> @@ -128,8 +129,11 @@ static int autosuspend_check(struct scsi
>  	if (!(sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_RUNNING ||
>  			sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_QUIESCE))
>  		return -ENODEV;
> +	if (!scsi_block_when_processing_errors(sdev))
> +		return -EBUSY;

Why this? It seems to me for purpose of autosuspend an offlined device
should be totally ignored.

	Regards
		Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ