linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] OpenVZ kernel based checkpointing/restart

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <48BE82F9.4020808@fr.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:28:41 +0200
From:	Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
To:	Andrey Mirkin <major@...nvz.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] OpenVZ kernel based checkpointing/restart

Andrey Mirkin wrote:
> This patchset introduces kernel based checkpointing/restart as it is
> implemented in OpenVZ project. This patchset has limited functionality and
> are able to checkpoint/restart only single process. Recently Oren Laaden
> sent another kernel based implementation of checkpoint/restart. The main
> differences between this patchset and Oren's patchset are:
> 
> * In this patchset checkpointing initiated not from the process
> (right now we do not have a container, only namespaces), Oren's patchset
> performs checkpointing from the process context.
> 
> * Restart in this patchset is initiated from process, which restarts a new
> process (in new namespaces) with saved state. Oren's patchset uses the same
> process from which restart was initiated and restore saved state over it.
> 
> * Checkpoint/restart functionality in this patchset is implemented as a kernel
> module

why ? Do we really think that C/R implementations will be so different that
we will need C/R ops to support all of them ? I imagine that there could be 
different models :

	1. brute force : dump it all and kill
	2. incremental
	3. live migration 
	...

But I see all of them really tied to the kernel internals.

The first issues I see with this direction are some EXPORT_SYMBOL() that would 
be useless without a module.

> As checkpointing is initiated not from the process which state should be saved
> we should freeze a process before saving its state. Right now Container Freezer
> from Matt Helsley can be used for this.

OK that's integrated and Daniel's tools :

http://lxc.cvs.sourceforge.net/lxc/

one more reason to work on integration :)

C. 

> This patchset introduce only a concept how kernel based checkpointing/restart
> can be implemented and are able to checkpoint/restart only a single process
> with simple VMAs. 
> 
> I've tried to split my patchset in small patches to make review more easier.
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives