linux-kernel - Re: regarding major number of block extended devt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:27:28 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	device@...ana.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: regarding major number of block extended devt

Tejun Heo wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> But just allocating a big bucket of device numbers and throw it all into
>> a pot semirandomly is likely to cause more damage, not less.
> 
> To use ext devt, the system has to use udev for device numbers.  As long
> as udev is used, the major number doesn't matter.

I'm sorry, but that's simply false.  There is a *lot* of code out there 
that assumes you can determine what the device is by correlating the 
major number with /proc/devices.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/