linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.27-rc5 doesn't boot on a Pavilion laptop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809031857020.3243@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:05:39 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Dmitry Nezhevenko <dion@...ex.net>
cc:	"Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@...driva.com.br>,
	herton@...driva.com.br,
	Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc5 doesn't boot on a Pavilion laptop

On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:15:40PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Dont think so. Your dmesg outputs do not show any sign of that
> > > disease.
> > > 
> > > Can you try the patch below please ?
> 
> I'm not original problem reporter. However I'm experiencing possible same
> problem with MSI M673 laptop. Here is link to bugzilla report (with
> dmesgs and other info):
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
> 
> 2.6.27-rc4 on this machine freezes with exactly same messages:
> 
> hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQ 2, 8, 31
> hpet0: 3 32-bit timers, 25000000 Hz
> ACPI: RTC can wake from S4
> 
> This patch do not help me
> 
> > @@ -228,6 +228,8 @@ static void tick_do_broadcast_on_off(voi
> >  	if (!tick_device_is_functional(dev))
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> > +	bc_stoppped = cpus_empty(tick_broadcast_mask);
> 
> btw little type here, should be "bc_stopped"

Yeah, noticed already. Sorry.

Find a debug patch below, which looks at the two functions which might
loop forver under certain conditions. Does one of the checks hit ?

Thanks,

	tglx
---
 kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c |   17 +++++++++++++++--
 kernel/time/tick-oneshot.c   |   13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
@@ -373,14 +373,27 @@ static int tick_broadcast_set_event(ktim
 {
 	struct clock_event_device *bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev;
 	ktime_t now = ktime_get();
-	int res;
+	static int once = 0;
+	int res, i;
 
-	for(;;) {
+	for(i = 0; ; i++) {
 		res = clockevents_program_event(bc, expires, now);
 		if (!res || !force)
 			return res;
 		now = ktime_get();
 		expires = ktime_add(now, ktime_set(0, bc->min_delta_ns));
+		if (i++ > 4) {
+			if (!once) {
+				printk(KERN_WARNING
+				       "tick_broadcast_set_event is "
+				       "stuck %llx %llx\n",
+				       now.tv64, expires.tv64);
+				WARN_ON(1);
+			}
+			/* Enforce it */
+			now = ktime_get();
+			expires = ktime_add_ns(now, bc->min_delta_ns << i);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-oneshot.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/tick-oneshot.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-oneshot.c
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ static int __tick_program_event(struct c
 				ktime_t expires, int force)
 {
 	ktime_t now = ktime_get();
+	static int once = 0;
+	int i = 0;
 
 	while (1) {
 		int ret = clockevents_program_event(dev, expires, now);
@@ -37,6 +39,17 @@ static int __tick_program_event(struct c
 			return ret;
 		now = ktime_get();
 		expires = ktime_add(now, ktime_set(0, dev->min_delta_ns));
+		if (i++ > 4) {
+			if (!once) {
+				printk(KERN_WARNING "__tick_program_event is "
+				       "stuck %llx %llx\n",
+				       now.tv64, expires.tv64);
+				WARN_ON(1);
+			}
+			/* Enforce it */
+			now = ktime_get();
+			expires = ktime_add_ns(now, dev->min_delta_ns << i);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/