[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0809031317080.19665@iabervon.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:18:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@...ervon.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christopher Desjardins <cddesjardins@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Lenovo 3000 N100 i8042 problems
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >
> > > I guess we could use System's product name to differentiate between
> > > Cristopher's and Daniel's boards. Although I must admit it is the very
> > > first time when I see a box that behaves better with active mux. DOes
> > > Vista use active mux nowadays? Because if it is not then I bet there is
> > > (or shortly will be) a BIOS update fixing legacy mode on Daniel's box.
> >
> > I guess so, yes.
> >
> > On the other hand, this might also be viewed as regression (we made
> > Daniel's hardware behave worse with recent kernel than it did before), so
> > I think we still would like to have this fixed. What about the patch
> > below, adding the match on System's product name, as you suggested?
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> I agree. Daniel, could you please try the patch to make sure it
> restores the previous behavior for you and I will push it through.
>
> Thanks!
I'll test that Thursday as well; is there some quick way to determine
whether you're using active mux or not?
-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists