[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48BE13C5.8020604@lwfinger.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:34:13 -0500
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix TSC calibration issues
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Larry Finger wrote:
>> I know that Linus has some problems with this patch, but FWIW it worked on my
>> K6. The dmesg output is
>>
>> TSC: PIT calibration deviates from PMTIMER: 428809 214401.
>> TSC: Using PIT calibration value
>> Detected 428.809 MHz processor.
>
> I don't have a problem with what the patch _does_ (I think all the added
> sanity checking is good).
>
> I just don't like how it makes the already rather complex and confusing
> function about ten times _more_ complex and confusing. It needs splitting
> up.
>
> But we can split it up after-the-fact as well as before-the-fact.
>
> Does this cleanup-patch (on _top_ of Thomas' patch) also work for you? It
> should do exactly the same thing, except it splits up the TSC PIT
> calibration into a function of its own.
>
> But I may obviously have introduced some silly bug when cleaning it up,
> so testing necessary..
Same result as Thomas' version.
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists