[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080903160705.0efd7308@doriath.conectiva>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:07:05 -0300
From: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@...driva.com.br>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Dmitry Nezhevenko <dion@...ex.net>, herton@...driva.com.br,
Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc5 doesn't boot on a Pavilion laptop
Em Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:40:55 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> escreveu:
| > As the dmesg has various WARN_ON() outputs I'm attaching it, this is
| > the first one:
| >
| > """
| > PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
| > DMAR:parse DMAR table failure.
| > hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 31
| > hpet0: 3 32-bit timers, 25000000 Hz
| > Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 0
| >
| > tick_broadcast_set_event is stuck f09fa64 f0a01e4
|
| Hmm, so we fail to force program that HPET with the standard minimum
| delta.
|
| I now see why this is happening and it is happening only on systems
| with a fast HPET. Your's running 25MHz, so the delta is only 1.92
| usec. I was staring at lots of those bugreports without noticing the
| frequency.
|
| Sigh. The idea to take a fixed number of HPET cycles as the minimum
| was not really brilliant it seems.
|
| Does the patch below help ? Keep the debug patch applied, as we can
| see whether the check triggers or not.
Yeah, it works. I have booted three times with no warnings.
I will revert the debug patch and test again just to be sure, if
this is of any help:
Tested-by: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <lcapitulino@...driva.com.br>
By the way, is this the definitive fix?
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists