linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] ide: Implement disk shock protection support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8763pc29u4.fsf@denkblock.local>
Date:	Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:33:39 +0200
From:	Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ide: Implement disk shock protection support

Elias Oltmanns <eo@...ensachen.de> wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
>> Also could you please move the new code to a separate file (i.e.
>> ide-park.c) instead of stuffing it all in ide.c?
>
> This is probably a sensible idea especially since there may be more once
> we go ahead with the in-kernel solution.

Sorry, I forgot to mention that I haven't a clue as to what headers to
include explicitly in such a file. Actually, ide-park.c compiles on my
system just with ide.h included. This would, however, be an unsuitably
minimal approach, I fear. Some advice would be most welcome.

Regards,

Elias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/