Peter Zijlstra provided me with a nice brown paper bag while letting me know that I was doing a logical AND and not a binary one, making a condition true more often than it should be. Luckily, a false true is handled by the calling function and no harm is done. But this needs to be fixed regardless. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- kernel/trace/trace.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: linux-tip.git/kernel/trace/trace.c =================================================================== --- linux-tip.git.orig/kernel/trace/trace.c 2008-09-03 16:46:28.000000000 -0400 +++ linux-tip.git/kernel/trace/trace.c 2008-09-03 16:46:30.000000000 -0400 @@ -1655,7 +1655,7 @@ print_lat_fmt(struct trace_iterator *ite case TRACE_PRINT: seq_print_ip_sym(s, field->print.ip, sym_flags); trace_seq_printf(s, ": %s", field->print.buf); - if (field->flags && TRACE_FLAG_CONT) + if (field->flags & TRACE_FLAG_CONT) trace_seq_print_cont(s, iter); break; default: @@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ static int print_trace_fmt(struct trace_ case TRACE_PRINT: seq_print_ip_sym(s, field->print.ip, sym_flags); trace_seq_printf(s, ": %s", field->print.buf); - if (field->flags && TRACE_FLAG_CONT) + if (field->flags & TRACE_FLAG_CONT) trace_seq_print_cont(s, iter); break; } @@ -1833,7 +1833,7 @@ static int print_raw_fmt(struct trace_it case TRACE_PRINT: trace_seq_printf(s, "# %lx %s", field->print.ip, field->print.buf); - if (field->flags && TRACE_FLAG_CONT) + if (field->flags & TRACE_FLAG_CONT) trace_seq_print_cont(s, iter); break; } -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/