linux-kernel - Re: [GIT]: Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080903.162444.150409734.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	tomasw@...il.com, yi.zhu@...el.com, linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:20:43 -0700 (PDT)

> 
> 
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > 4) Several iwlwifi fixes:
> 
> Are these really regressions?
> 
> And if they aren't, why are they here and now?
> 
> Are people really so _stupid_ that they think that no fixes ever cause new 
> regressions, so that they think that because they are "fixes" they are 
> safe?
> 
> Please, guys. I complained once about this already. What's so hard to 
> understand?

I pushed back on these guys a lot, so did John Linville.

But you're right, I'll just stop taking things from the Intel wireless
people.

I'm fucking tired of their shit too.

Maybe now they'll learn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/