linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809030922280.17860@anakin>
Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:22:52 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
cc:	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 09:31:43AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 02:13:24PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> > > > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > >> A patch for removing the comempci code is below.
> > > >>
> > > >> It's a bit suspicious that asm/elia.h is now removed since comempci.c  
> > > >> was the only user. What's the sttus of the eLIA platform?
> > > >
> > > > Only ever a handful where made, and that was in 1999.
> > > > I doubt anyone could ever use the PCI interface on it
> > > > in any useful way.
> > > 
> > > So I can send a patch to remove the platform?
> > > 
> > > >> But COMEMPCI fails with a different error - this init/main.o build 
> > > >> error is present for CONFIG_PCI=y, CONFIG_COMEMPCI=n, so the dependency 
> > > >> of PCI on BROKEN is still required (unless it gets fixed).
> > > >
> > > > Unless I am mistaken there is now no need for the CONFIG_PCI option
> > > > if selecting m68knommu. The only m68knommu platforms that had PCI
> > > > as far as I know where those that use the comempci part.
> > > 
> > > That implies I can also kill the m68k PCI code since m68knommu will 
> > > never use it?
> > 
> > Sure. If the FreeScale guys ever forward-port their ColdFire/MMU code to
> > current mainline, we can readd it.
> 
> Patch (on top of my Hades removal patch) is below.
> 
> cu
> Adrian
> 
> 
> <--  snip    -->
> 
> 
> This patch removes the no longer used m68k PCI code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>

Thanks! Will queue for 2.6.28, too.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/